It so happens that once a woman becomes a mother her identity usually goes for a toss. Everything suddenly becomes riveted around her child. The case of Mary is no different. As the infancy narrative of Jesus unfolds in the Gospel of Luke, a sword pierces Mary’s soul (2:35); her name ebbs from the narrative after 2:34; and finally once her Son speaks (2:48-49) Mary is altogether rendered voiceless. Luke doesn’t even include her among the women at the crucifixion of Jesus (24:10).
In such a milieu, Jesus’ frequent addressing of Mary as “Woman” seems to reaffirm her personal identity. It’s a means of reassuring Mary that she is more than a mother. Even when the contemporaries of Jesus, reduced Mary to breasts and womb (Lk. 11: 27) Jesus instantly protested this biological reduction by accrediting Mary for her indomitable decision to enflesh the Word of God (Lk. 11:28) dismissing all the social mores, personal safety and relational obligations. Hence Dorothy L. Sayers remarked of Jesus;
“šš¦š³š©š¢š±š“ šŖšµ šŖš“ šÆš° šøš°šÆš„š¦š³ šµš©š¢šµ šµš©š¦ šøš°š®š¦šÆ šøš¦š³š¦ š§šŖš³š“šµ š¢šµ šµš©š¦ šš³š¢š„šš¦ š¢šÆš„ šš¢š“šµ š¢šµ šµš©š¦ šš³š°š“š“. šš©š¦šŗ š©š¢š„ šÆš¦š·š¦š³ š¬šÆš°šøšÆ š¢ š®š¢šÆ ššŖš¬š¦ šµš©šŖš“ šš¢šÆ, šµš©š¦š³š¦ šÆš¦š·š¦š³ š©š¢š“ š£š¦š¦šÆ š“š¶š¤š© š¢šÆš°šµš©š¦š³. š š±š³š°š±š©š¦šµ š¢šÆš„ šµš¦š¢š¤š©š¦š³ šøš©š° šÆš¦š·š¦š³ šÆš¢šØšØš¦š„ š¢šµ šµš©š¦š®, šÆš¦š·š¦š³ š§šš¢šµšµš¦š³š¦š„ š°š³ š¤š°š¢š¹š¦š„ š°š³ š±š¢šµš³š°šÆšŖš“š¦š„; šøš©š° šÆš¦š·š¦š³ š®š¢š„š¦ š¢š³š¤š© š«š°š¬š¦š“ š¢š£š°š¶šµ šµš©š¦š®, šÆš¦š·š¦š³ šµš³š¦š¢šµš¦š„ šµš©š¦š® š¦šŖšµš©š¦š³ š¢š“ ‘šš©š¦ šøš°š®š¦šÆ, šš°š„ š©š¦šš± š¶š“!’ š°š³ ‘šš©š¦ šš¢š„šŖš¦š“, šš°š„ š£šš¦š“š“ šµš©š¦š®!'”
May we acknowledge and appreciate the personal identity of women in our lives and stand at odds with the skewed gender politics that reduces and refers to women on the ground of relationships. May Mary brace us for this task as her very name in Hebrew means ‘rebel’.
šš¦š“šµš¢š šš³š¦š¦šµšŖšÆšØš“ !
~ ššš²š«šØš²šØ š š«. ššš¬š¢š„
